000			02608nam a2200361 i 4500
001			CR9781009051736
003			UkCbUP
005			20240909185049.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr||||||||||||
008			210223s2023||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020			_a9781009051736 (ebook)
020			_z9781316511909 (hardback)
020			_z9781009054799 (paperback)
040			_aUkCbUP _beng _erda _cUkCbUP
043			_ae-uk-en
050	0	0	_aKD681.I55 _bS27 2023
082	0	0	_a340.90942 _223/eng/20220520
100	1		_aŠaranović, Filip, _d1988- _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aFreezing injunctions in private international law / _cFilip Šaranović.
264		1	_aCambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _c2023.
300			_a1 online resource (xi, 264 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
500			_aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 20 Oct 2022).
505	0		_aIntroduction -- Historical foundations of freezing injunctions -- Theoretical foundations of freezing injunctions -- Theoretical foundations of jurisdiction in private international law -- Application of jurisdictional theories -- Reform proposals -- The relationship between freezing injunctions and other interim relief -- Conclusions.
520			_aThe extent of available pre-judgment asset preservation relief is widely regarded as a unique characteristic of English law and one of the key factors attracting international commercial litigation to the English courts. By taking a novel view of the theoretical foundations of a freezing injunction, this book challenges the long-established view that such an injunction is an in personam form of relief whose sole purpose is to prevent unscrupulous defendants from making themselves judgment-proof. Dr Šaranović combines historical and comparative perspectives to identify several theoretical flaws in the court's jurisdiction to grant this popular form of interim relief. The book demonstrates that the current application of private international law rules in this field leads to inequality among litigants and illegitimate encroachment upon the sovereignty of foreign states. It proposes a range of possible solutions to alleviate concerns about the scope of freezing injunctions both in the domestic and international arena.
650		0	_aConflict of laws _xInjunctions _zEngland.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9781316511909
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009051736
942			_2ddc _cEB
999			_c9771 _d9771