000 02269nam a2200385 i 4500
001 CR9781108608794
003 UkCbUP
005 20240830164446.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 180510s2022||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 _a9781108608794 (ebook)
020 _z9781108497367 (hardback)
020 _z9781108740029 (paperback)
040 _aUkCbUP
_beng
_erda
_cUkCbUP
043 _ae------
050 4 _aKJC5138
_b.D94 2022
082 0 4 _a341.48094
_223
100 1 _aDzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin,
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aCan the European Court of Human Rights shape European public order? /
_cKanstantsin Dzehtsiarou.
264 1 _aCambridge :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2022.
300 _a1 online resource (xxx, 220 pages) :
_bdigital, PDF file(s).
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aCambridge studies in European law and policy
500 _aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 25 Nov 2021).
520 _aIn this book, Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou argues that, from the legal perspective, the formula 'European public order' is excessively vague and does not have an identifiable meaning; therefore, it should not be used by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in its reasoning. However, European public order can also be understood as an analytical concept which does not require a clearly defined content. In this sense, the ECtHR can impact European public order but cannot strategically shape it. The Court's impact is a by-product of individual cases which create a feedback loop with the contracting states. European public order is influenced as a result of interaction between the Court and the contracting parties. This book uses a wide range of sources and evidence to substantiate its core arguments: from a comprehensive analysis of the Court's case law to research interviews with the judges of the ECtHR.
610 2 0 _aEuropean Court of Human Rights.
650 0 _aHuman rights
_zEurope.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_z9781108497367
830 0 _aCambridge studies in European law and policy.
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108608794
942 _2ddc
_cEB
999 _c9572
_d9572