000			03503cam a2200541 i 4500
001			9781003148944
003			FlBoTFG
005			20240213122831.0
006			m d | |
007			cr |||||||||||
008			201124t20212021enk ob 001 0 eng
040			_aOCoLC-P _beng _erda _cOCoLC-P
020			_a9781000386202 _qelectronic book
020			_a1000386201 _qelectronic book
020			_a9781003148944 _qelectronic book
020			_a1003148948 _qelectronic book
020			_a9781000386226 _q(electronic bk. : EPUB)
020			_a1000386228 _q(electronic bk. : EPUB)
020			_z9780367710095 _qhardcover
035			_a(OCoLC)1226075397
035			_a(OCoLC-P)1226075397
050	0	4	_aK3165 _b.P673 2021
072		7	_aLAW _x000000 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aLAW _x001000 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aLAW _x016000 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aLND _2bicssc
082	0	0	_a342.4/0011 _223
245	0	0	_aPopulist challenges to constitutional interpretation in Europe and beyond / _cedited by Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz and Zoltán Szente.
264		1	_aAbingdon, Oxon ; _aNew York, NY : _bRoutledge, _c2021.
264		4	_c©2021
300			_a1 online resource (xvi, 329 pages).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aComparative constitutional change
505	0		_aTheoretical implications -- Constitutional interpretation and populism in Europe -- An outlook -- Summary.
520			_a"This book explores the relationship between populism or populist regimes and constitutional interpretation used in those regimes. The volume discusses the question of whether contemporary populist governments and movements have developed, or encouraged new and specific constitutional theories, doctrines and methods of interpretation, or whether their constitutional and other high courts continue to use the old, traditional interpretative tools in constitutional adjudication. Divided into four parts, Part I contains three chapters elaborating the theoretical basis for the discussion. Part II examines the topic from a comparative perspective, representing those European countries where populism is most prevalent, including: Austria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Romania, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Part III extends the focus to the United States, reflecting how American jurisprudence and academia have produced the most important contributions to the theory of constitutional interpretation, and recent political developments in that country might challenge the traditional understanding of judicial review. This section also includes a general overview on Latin America, where there are also some populist governments and strong populist movements. Finally, the editors' closing study analyzes the outcomes of the comparative research, summarizing the conclusions of the book"-- _cProvided by publisher.
588			_aOCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
650		0	_aConstitutional law.
650		0	_aPopulism.
650		7	_aLAW / General _2bisacsh
650		7	_aLAW / Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice _2bisacsh
650		7	_aLAW / Comparative _2bisacsh
700	1		_aGárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina, _eeditor.
700	1		_aSzente, Zoltán, _eeditor.
856	4	0	_3Taylor & Francis _uhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003148944
856	4	2	_3OCLC metadata license agreement _uhttp://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/forms/terms/vbrl-201703.pdf
999			_c5905 _d5905