000			04314nam a2200529 i 4500
001			9781509937011
003			CaBNVSL
005			20240319171813.0
006			m o d
007			cr cn||||m|||a
008			220102s2022 enk ob 101 0 eng d
020			_a9781509937011 _q(online)
020			_a9781509936991 _q(ePub)
020			_z9781509955497 _q(softback)
020			_z9781509936984 _q(hardback)
024	7		_a10.5040/9781509937011 _2doi
035			_a(OCoLC)1291220725
040			_aCaBNVSL _beng _erda _cCaBNVSL _dCaBNVSL
043			_au-at---
050		4	_aK247 _b.C276 2022eb
082	0	4	_a342 _223
100	1		_aCarter, Anne, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aProportionality and facts in constitutional adjudication / _cAnne Carter.
250			_aFirst edition.
264		1	_aLondon [England] : _bHart Publishing, _c2022
264		2	_a[London, England] : _bBloomsbury Publishing, _c2022
300			_a1 online resource (272 pages).
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aHart Studies in Constitutional Theory.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aForeword -- Acknowledgements Table of Cases Table of Legislation -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The Fact-Dependent Nature of Proportionality -- 3. Understanding Facts -- 4. Proportionality and Facts in Comparative Perspective -- 5. Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law -- 6. The Factual Basis of Proportionality in Australia -- 7. Procedural Implications -- 8. Conclusion: Why Facts Matter -- Bibliography -- Index
506			_aAbstract freely available; full-text restricted to individual document purchasers.
520			_a"This book considers the relationship between proportionality and facts in constitutional adjudication. Analysing where facts arise within each of the three stages of the structured proportionality test - suitability, necessity, and balancing - it considers the nature of these 'facts' vis-à-vis the facts that arise in the course of ordinary litigation. The book's central focus is on how proportionality has been applied by courts in practice, and it draws on the comparative experience of four jurisdictions across a range of legal systems. The central case study of the book is Australia, where the embryonic and contested nature of proportionality means it provides an illuminating study of how facts can inform the framing of constitutional tests. The rich proportionality jurisprudence from Germany, Canada, and South Africa is used to contextualise the approach of the High Court of Australia and to identify future directions for proportionality in Australia, at a time when the doctrine is in its formative stages. The book has three broad aims: First, it considers the role of facts within proportionality reasoning. Second, it offers procedural insights into fact-finding in constitutional litigation. Third, the book's analysis of the dynamic Australian case-law on proportionality means it also serves to clarify the nature and status of proportionality in Australia at a critical moment. Since the 2015 decision of McCloy v New South Wales , where four justices supported the introduction of a structured three-part test of proportionality, the Court has continued to disagree about the utility of such a test. These developments mean that this book, with its doctrinal and comparative approach, is particularly timely."-- _cProvided by publisher.
532	0		_aCompliant with Level AA of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Content is displayed as HTML full text which can easily be resized or read with assistive technology, with mark-up that allows screen readers and keyboard-only users to navigate easily.
538			_aMode of access: World Wide Web.
650		0	_aProportionality in law _zAustralia.
650		0	_aConstitutional law _zAustralia.
650		0	_aConstitutional history _zAustralia.
650		0	_aProportionality in law.
655		4	_aElectronic books.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9781509955497
830		0	_aHart Studies in Constitutional Theory
856	4	0	_3Abstract with links to full text _uhttps://doi.org/10.5040/9781509937011?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections _qtext/html
975			_aHart Publishing 2022
999			_c10696 _d10696