000			03965nam a2200601 i 4500
001			9781509931606
003			CaBNVSL
005			20240318155732.0
006			m o d
007			cr cn|||||||||
008			201221s2020 enk ob 101 0 eng d
010			_z 2020038479 (print)
020			_a9781509931606 _q(ebook)
020			_z9781509931590 _q(PDF)
020			_z9781509944576 _q(print)
020			_z9781509931576 _q(hardback)
020			_z1509931570 _q(print)
020			_z1509944575 _q(print)
020			_z9781509931583 _q(ePub)
024	7		_a10.5040/9781509931606 _2doi
035			_a(OCoLC)1238133350
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cCaBNVSL _dCaBNVSL
050		4	_aK3608 _b.N55 2021eb
082	0	0	_a344.04/4 _223
100	1		_aNilsson, Anna, _d1977- _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aCompulsory mental health interventions and the CRPD : _bminding equality / _cAnna Nilsson.
250			_aFirst edition.
264		1	_aOxford, UK ; _bHart Publishing, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing, _c2020.
264		2	_a[London, England] : _bBloomsbury Publishing, _c2020
300			_a1 online resource (200 pages).
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aHart studies in law and health
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aThe Convention's approach to mental health care -- Putting mental health laws to the test -- Proportionality reasoning -- Proportionality and non-discrimination.
506			_aAbstract freely available; full-text restricted to individual document purchasers.
520			_a"This book delineates the scope of permissible compulsory mental health interventions under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The initial impetus for this study was provided by a conflict between two competing positions within the current debate over the future of coercive psychiatry. According to one position, defended by the CRPD Committee, among others, compulsory mental health care necessarily violates the prohibition of discrimination. According to the competing position, supported by the vast majority of states, compulsion is sometimes necessary to protect health and life and, if coupled with appropriate legal safeguards, it is lawful under such circumstances. This book disputes both positions and argues that the scope of permissible compulsory care can be identified using proportionality reasoning. Drawing on the work of Robert Alexy, it develops a framework for proportionality assessments within the context of non-discrimination. The framework can assist decision-makers to design principled and evidence-based mental health care regimes. This book thus provides a new way forward for states parties looking to reform their mental health care regimes to make them better comply with the CRPD. It will appeal to academics and practitioners engaged in mental health reform in the post-CRPD era"-- _cProvided by publisher.
530			_aAlso published in print.
532	0		_aCompliant with Level AA of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Content is displayed as HTML full text which can easily be resized or read with assistive technology, with mark-up that allows screen readers and keyboard-only users to navigate easily
538			_aMode of access: World Wide Web.
630	0	0	_aConvention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol _d(2007 March 30)
650		0	_aMental health laws.
650		0	_aMental health services.
650		0	_aMentally ill _xCare.
650		7	_aMedical & healthcare law _2bicssc
655		0	_aElectronic books.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9781509944576
830		0	_aHart studies in law and health
856	4	0	_3Abstract with links to full text _uhttps://doi.org/10.5040/9781509931606?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections
975			_aHart Publishing 2021
999			_c10625 _d10625