000			06323nam a2200661 i 4500
001			9781509930487
003			CaBNVSL
005			20240318131658.0
006			m o d
007			cr cn|||||||||
008			200122s2020 ilua ob 101 0 eng d
010			_z 2019040267 (print)
020			_a9781509930487 _q(ebook)
020			_a9781509930463 _q(epub)
020			_z9781509930456 _q(print)
020			_z1509930469 _q(print)
020			_z9781509930470 _q(PDF)
024	7		_a10.5040/9781509930487 _2doi
035			_a(OCoLC)1121424494
035			_a(CaBNVSL)mat09930487
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cCaBNVSL _dCaBNVSL
043			_ae-uk--- _an-us--- _ae------
050	0	0	_aK3275 _b.S845 2020eb
082	0	0	_a342.082 _223
100	1		_aStefanelli, Justine N, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aJudicial review of immigration detention in the UK, US, and EU : _bfrom principles to practice / _cJustine N Stefanelli.
264		1	_aChicago, Illinois : _bHart Publishing, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing, _c2020.
264		2	_a[London, England] : _bBloomsbury Publishing, _c2020
300			_a1 online resource : _billustrations
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_a1. Introduction -- I. The Detention Machine -- II. Immigration Detention in Literature -- III. Issues Explored IV. Approach of this Book -- V. Structure of the Book -- 2. Liberty and the Historic Context of Immigration Detention -- I. Introduction -- II. The United Kingdom -- III. The United States -- IV. The European Union -- V. Conclusion -- 3. Current Legal Frameworks -- I. Introduction -- II. Origins of the Modern Systems -- III. Detention Authorities -- IV. Grounds for Detention -- V. Non-statutory Guidance on Detention Decision-Making -- VI. Additional Detention Provisions in the Return Directive -- VII. Conclusion -- 4. Judicial Intervention into Detention -- I. Introduction -- II. Courts and Judges -- III. Judicial Review Proceedings -- IV. Legal Representation and Access to Justice for Detainees -- V. Modern Judicial Review of Detention -- VI. Conclusion -- 5. Balancing Factors -- I. Introduction -- II. Case Basics -- III. The Legality Tests -- IV. Likelihood of Removal and Due Diligence -- V. Assessing Risk -- VI. Detainee Non-co-operation -- VII. Pursuit of Legal Remedies against Removal or Deportation -- VIII. Conclusion -- 6. Using the Law -- I. Introduction -- II. The Doctrine of Precedent -- III. Fundamental Rights -- IV. Impact of Detention Time Limits on Judicial Decision-Making -- V. Quality of Law -- VI. Conclusion -- 7. The Business of Judging I. Introduction -- II. Judges as Fact-Finders, Reviewers or Law-Makers -- III. The Role of Deference -- IV. Conclusion -- 8. Conclusion -- I. Introduction -- II. Detention: An Origin Story -- III. Accounting for Outcomes -- IV. Moving Forward.
506			_aAbstract freely available; full-text restricted to individual document purchasers.
520			_a"Immigration detention is considered by many states to be a necessary tool in the execution of immigration policy. Despite the apparently key role it plays in immigration enforcement, the law on immigration detention is often vague, especially in relation to determining the circumstances under which prolonged detention remains lawful. As a result, the courts are frequently called upon to adjudicate these matters, with scant legal tools at their disposal. Though there have been some significant judgments on the legality of detention at the constitutional level, the extent to which these judgments have had an impact at the lower end of the judiciary is unclear. Indeed, it is the lower courts which are tasked with judging the legality of detention through habeas corpus or judicial review proceedings. This book examines the way this has occurred in the lower courts of two jurisdictions, the UK and the US, and contrasts this practice not only in those jurisdictions, but with judgments rendered by the Court of Justice of the European Union, a constitutional court at the other end of the judicial spectrum whose judgments are applied by courts and tribunals in the EU Member States. Although these three jurisdictions use similar tests to evaluate the legality of detention, case outcomes significantly differ. Many factors contribute to this divergence, but key among them is the role that fundamental rights protection plays in each jurisdiction. Through a forensic evaluation of 191 judgments, this book compares the laws on detention in the UK, US and EU, and makes recommendations to these jurisdictions for improvement"-- _cProvided by publisher.
530			_aAlso published in print.
532	0		_aCompliant with Level AA of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Content is displayed as HTML full text which can easily be resized or read with assistive technology, with mark-up that allows screen readers and keyboard-only users to navigate easily
538			_aMode of access: World Wide Web.
588			_aDescription based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.
610	2	0	_aCourt of Justice of the European Union.
650		0	_aEmigration and immigration law _zGreat Britain.
650		0	_aEmigration and immigration law _zUnited States.
650		0	_aEmigration and immigration law _zEuropean Union countries.
650		0	_aAlien detention centers _zGreat Britain.
650		0	_aAlien detention centers _zUnited States.
650		0	_aAlien detention centers _zEuropean Union countries.
650		0	_aIllegal aliens _zGreat Britain.
650		0	_aIllegal aliens _zUnited States.
650		0	_aIllegal aliens _zEuropean Union countries.
650		0	_aJudicial review.
650		7	_aImmigration law _2bicssc
655		0	_aElectronic books.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _aStefanelli, Justine N. _tJudicial review of immigration detention in the UK, US, and EU _dChicago : Hart Publishing, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing, 2020. _z9781509930456 _w(DLC) 2019040266
856	4	0	_3Abstract with links to full text _uhttps://doi.org/10.5040/9781509930487?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections
975			_aHart Publishing 2020
999			_c10609 _d10609