000			04066nam a22004931i 4500
001			18404813
003			UtOrBLW
005			20240311154350.0
006			m d
007			cr un ---uuuua
008			150116s2014 enk ob 001 0 eng d
020			_a9781474201339
020			_z9781782254782 (PDF)
020			_z9781782254799 (electronic book)
020			_z9781849465465 (hardback)
024	7		_a10.5040/9781474201339 _2doi
035			_a(OCoLC)897376683
040			_aUtOrBLW _beng _cUtOrBLW _dUkLoBP _erda _epn
041			_aeng
050	0	0	_aK564.H8 _bP47 2014
082	0	4	_a344.04194 _223
245	0	0	_aPersons, parts and property : _bhow should we regulate human tissue in the 21st century? / _cedited by Imogen Goold, Kate Greasley, Jonathan Herring and Loane Skene.
264		1	_aOxford, United Kingdom : _bHart Pub, _c2014.
300			_a1 online resource (xxiv, 309 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_a1. Introduction Imogen Goold, Kate Greasley, Jonathan Herring and Loane Skene -- 2. Impressions on the Body, Property and Research Dianne Nicol, Don Chalmers, Rebekah McWhirter and -- Joanne Dickinson -- 3. The Problems of Biobanking and the Law of Gifts Cameron Stewart, Wendy Lipworth, Lorena Aparicio, -- Jennifer Fleming and Ian Kerridge -- 4. Unintended Side Effects of the National Health Service Thomas Krebs -- 5. Public Umbilical Cord Blood Banking and Charitable Trusts Cameron Stewart, Lorena Aparicio, Wendy Lipworth and Ian Kerridge -- 6. Property Rights in the Human Body: Commodification and Objectification Kate Greasley -- 7. Property Rights in Human Biological Material Simon Douglas -- 8. The Boundaries of Property Law Jesse Wall -- 9. Abandonment and Human Tissue Imogen Goold -- 10. Cadavers, Body Parts and the Remedial Problem Remigius N Nwabueze -- 11. Alternatives to a Corporate Commons: Biobanking, Genetics and Property in the Body Donna Dickenson --
520			_a"The debate over whether human bodies and their parts should be governed by the laws of property has accelerated with the pace of technological change. The common law first recognised that there could be a property interest in human tissue in some circumstances in the early 1900s, but it was not until a string of judicial decisions and statutory regulation in the 1990s and early 2000s that the place of this 'exception' was cemented. The 2009 decision of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in Yearworth & Ors v North Bristol NHS Trust added a new dimension to the debate by supporting a move towards a broader, more principled basis for finding (or rejecting) property rights in human tissue. However, the law relating to property rights in human bodies and their parts remains highly contested. The contributions in this volume represent a collation of the broad spectrum of analyses on offer, and a detailed exploration of the salient legal and theoretical puzzles arising out of the body-as-property question."--Bloomsbury Publishing.
530			_aAlso issued in print.
532	1		_aCompliant with Level AA of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Content is displayed as HTML full text which can easily be resized or read with assistive technology, with mark-up that allows screen readers and keyboard-only users to navigate easily
533			_aElectronic reproduction. _bLondon : _cBloomsbury Publishing, _d2015 _nAvailable via World Wide Web. _nAccess limited by licensing agreement.
650		0	_aHuman body _xLaw and legislation.
650		7	_2Medical & healthcare law
700	1		_aGoold, Imogen, _eeditor.
700	1		_aGreasley, Kate, _eeditor.
700	1		_aHerring, Jonathan, _eeditor.
700	1		_aSkene, Loane, _eeditor.
776	0		_aOriginal _w(DLC) 18404813
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.5040/9781474201339?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections
975			_aHart Publishing 2014
999			_c10438 _d10438