000			03292nam a2200397 i 4500
001			CR9781009091909
003			UkCbUP
005			20240301142641.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr||||||||||||
008			210503s2022||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020			_a9781009091909 (ebook)
020			_z9781316515051 (hardback)
020			_z9781009095853 (paperback)
040			_aUkCbUP _beng _erda _cUkCbUP
043			_an-us---
050	0	0	_aKF4788 _b.B38 2022
082	0	0	_a342.73/07 _223/eng/20220531
100	1		_aBatchis, Wayne, _d1974- _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aThrowing the party : _bhow the Supreme Court puts political party organizations ahead of voters / _cWayne Batchis, University of Delaware.
264		1	_aCambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _c2022.
300			_a1 online resource (xiii, 264 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aCambridge studies on civil rights and civil liberties
500			_aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 20 Jun 2022).
505	0		_aIntroduction -- The Supreme Court's approach to political parties -- The association versus the individual -- Setting the stage -- Primaries and the party in the electorate : the right to vote -- Double standards : organizations over individuals and major over minor parties -- Doubling down on the party organization in service of the major parties -- Party speech through money -- An Ill-fitting party campaign finance jurisprudence -- Parties and the current campaign finance landscape -- Party and equality -- The political question : is there room for equal protection in partisan gerrymandering? -- A potential solution : the party system as a public forum -- Conclusion.
520			_aThe Supreme Court's jurisprudence on political parties is rooted in an incomplete story. Parties are, like voluntary clubs, associations of individuals that are represented by a singular organization. However, as political science has long understood, they are much more than this. Parties are also the voters who choose and support their candidates, the elected officials who govern, the activists and volunteers who contribute their time and energy, and the individual and organizational donors who open their wallets. Unfortunately, the Court's framework for understanding America's two-party system has largely ignored this broader conception of political parties. The result has been a distortion of the true nature of the two-party system, and a body of deeply inconsistent and contradictory constitutional case law. From primaries to campaign finance, partisan gerrymandering to ballot access, law and politics scholar Wayne Batchis interrogates, scrutinizes, and offers a proposed solution to this problematic jurisprudence.
650		0	_aPolitical parties _xLaw and legislation _zUnited States _xCases.
650		0	_aPolitical questions and judicial power _zUnited States _xCases.
651		0	_aUnited States _xPolitics and government _xCases.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9781316515051
830		0	_aCambridge studies on civil rights and civil liberties.
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009091909
999			_c10199 _d10199