NLU Meghalaya Library

Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC)

Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Courting constitutionalism : the politics of public law and judicial review in Pakistan / Moeen Cheema, Australian National University.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Cambridge studies in constitutional lawPublisher: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2022Description: 1 online resource (xxvii, 259 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9781108913065 (ebook)
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Print version: : No titleDDC classification:
  • 347.5491/012 23
LOC classification:
  • KPL2461 .C44 2022
Online resources:
Contents:
Postcolonia legality : fragments of the rule of law and constitutionalism -- Martial rule : military-bureaucratic authoritarianism and 'basic" constitutionalism -- Elective dictatorship : socialist populism and the myth of a consensus constitution -- Praetorian governmentality : Islamization of laws and the substantive constitutionalism -- indirect praetorianism : 'Public interest litigation' and the first wave of jurdicial activism -- Military-civil composite : 'military incorporated' and the 'lawyers' movement' -- Coporatist governance : the 'Chaudhry Court' and 'judicial proactivism' -- Conclusion : judicialization of politics in Pakistan.
Summary: Over the last decade, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has emerged as a powerful and overtly political institution. While the strong form of judicial review adopted by the Supreme Court has fostered the perception of a sudden and ahistorical judicialisation of politics, the judiciary's prominent role in adjudicating issues of governance and statecraft was long in the making. This book presents a deeply contextualised account of law in Pakistan and situates the judicial review jurisprudence of the superior courts in the context of historical developments in constitutional politics, evolution of state structures and broader social transformations. This book highlights that the bedrock of judicial review has remained in administrative law; it is through the consistent development of the 'Writ jurisdiction' and the judicial review of administrative action that Pakistan's superior courts have progressively carved an expansive institutional role and aggrandised themselves to the status of the regulator of the state.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
eBooks eBooks Central Library Management Available EB0258

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 16 Dec 2021).

Postcolonia legality : fragments of the rule of law and constitutionalism -- Martial rule : military-bureaucratic authoritarianism and 'basic" constitutionalism -- Elective dictatorship : socialist populism and the myth of a consensus constitution -- Praetorian governmentality : Islamization of laws and the substantive constitutionalism -- indirect praetorianism : 'Public interest litigation' and the first wave of jurdicial activism -- Military-civil composite : 'military incorporated' and the 'lawyers' movement' -- Coporatist governance : the 'Chaudhry Court' and 'judicial proactivism' -- Conclusion : judicialization of politics in Pakistan.

Over the last decade, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has emerged as a powerful and overtly political institution. While the strong form of judicial review adopted by the Supreme Court has fostered the perception of a sudden and ahistorical judicialisation of politics, the judiciary's prominent role in adjudicating issues of governance and statecraft was long in the making. This book presents a deeply contextualised account of law in Pakistan and situates the judicial review jurisprudence of the superior courts in the context of historical developments in constitutional politics, evolution of state structures and broader social transformations. This book highlights that the bedrock of judicial review has remained in administrative law; it is through the consistent development of the 'Writ jurisdiction' and the judicial review of administrative action that Pakistan's superior courts have progressively carved an expansive institutional role and aggrandised themselves to the status of the regulator of the state.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
© 2022- NLU Meghalaya. All Rights Reserved. || Implemented and Customized by
OPAC Visitors

Powered by Koha