NLU Meghalaya Library

Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC)

Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Assisted reproduction, discrimination, and the law / Dr. Michelle Weldon-Johns.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY Routledge, 2020Description: 1 online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9780429465895
  • 0429465890
  • 9780429880001
  • 0429880006
  • 9780429879999
  • 0429879997
  • 9780429879982
  • 0429879989
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 346.4101/7 23
LOC classification:
  • KD3103.W6
Online resources:
Contents:
Introduction -- Current conceptions of equality and the limitations for those involved in assisted reproduction -- Conceiving a more social model of disability : infertility as disability -- Conceiving a new interpretation of pregnancy and sex discrimination : redefining the boundaries -- A right to time off work to undergo ART treatments -- Conclusions
Summary: "The numbers of women undergoing Assisted Reproduction Technology (ART) treatments have risen steadily, yet they remain largely outside the scope of equality and employment law protection while undergoing treatment. Assisted Reproduction, Discrimination and the Law examines this gap in UK law, with reference to EU law as appropriate, and argues that new conceptions of equality are necessary. Drawing from the literature on multidimensional and intersectional discrimination, it is argued that an intersectionality approach offers a more useful analytical framework to extend protection to those engaged in ART treatments. Drawing from Schiek's intersectional nodes model, the book critically examines two alternative interpretations of existing protected characteristics, namely: infertility as a disability, with reference to the social model of disability and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2006; and redefining the boundaries of pregnancy and/or sex discrimination, with reference to attempts to extend associative discrimination to pregnancy. Comparisons are drawn with the US, where infertility has been recognised as a disability under the American's with Disabilities Act 1990 and as a pregnancy-related condition under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act 1978. A specific right to paid time off work to undergo treatment is also proposed, drawing comparisons with the US Family and Medical Leave Act 1993 and the existing UK work-family rights framework. It is argued that the reinterpretations of equality law and the rights proposed here are not only conceptually possible, but could practically be achieved with minor, but significant, amendments to existing legislation"-- Provided by publisher.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Introduction -- Current conceptions of equality and the limitations for those involved in assisted reproduction -- Conceiving a more social model of disability : infertility as disability -- Conceiving a new interpretation of pregnancy and sex discrimination : redefining the boundaries -- A right to time off work to undergo ART treatments -- Conclusions

"The numbers of women undergoing Assisted Reproduction Technology (ART) treatments have risen steadily, yet they remain largely outside the scope of equality and employment law protection while undergoing treatment. Assisted Reproduction, Discrimination and the Law examines this gap in UK law, with reference to EU law as appropriate, and argues that new conceptions of equality are necessary. Drawing from the literature on multidimensional and intersectional discrimination, it is argued that an intersectionality approach offers a more useful analytical framework to extend protection to those engaged in ART treatments. Drawing from Schiek's intersectional nodes model, the book critically examines two alternative interpretations of existing protected characteristics, namely: infertility as a disability, with reference to the social model of disability and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2006; and redefining the boundaries of pregnancy and/or sex discrimination, with reference to attempts to extend associative discrimination to pregnancy. Comparisons are drawn with the US, where infertility has been recognised as a disability under the American's with Disabilities Act 1990 and as a pregnancy-related condition under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act 1978. A specific right to paid time off work to undergo treatment is also proposed, drawing comparisons with the US Family and Medical Leave Act 1993 and the existing UK work-family rights framework. It is argued that the reinterpretations of equality law and the rights proposed here are not only conceptually possible, but could practically be achieved with minor, but significant, amendments to existing legislation"-- Provided by publisher.

OCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
© 2022- NLU Meghalaya. All Rights Reserved. || Implemented and Customized by
OPAC Visitors

Powered by Koha